JD Vance’s child-care pitch would pay married parents to stay home and steer family policy toward marriage-based support. Critics say it would leave low-income single mothers worse off, deepen inequality, and waste money without raising fertility.
Discussion: Voices: Hollis Robbins, Matthew Yglesias, Meagan O'Rourke View all 12 voices
- • DOGE Bills Could Come Back to Haunt Republicans (David Dayen | The American Prospect)
- • A Plan to Pay Married Mothers Not to Work (Annie Lowrey | The Atlantic)
- • A Plan to Pay Married Mothers Not to Work (Annie Lowrey | The Atlantic)
- • There's No Market Failure in Choosing to Stay Home. So Why Subsidize It? (Veronique de Rugy | Reason)
- • Fertility-maxxing without shame (Hollis Robbins | UnHerd)
- • Trump, la Borsa e l’anestesia Usa (Massimo Gaggi | Corriere della Sera)
- • Foreign-Built US Warships? It Might Work (Sara George | CEPA)
- • Rebalancing Trade in a Fragmented International Order (Steven Randy Waldman | Liberal Currents)
- • Trump’s terrible plan to break skilled immigration (Matthew Yglesias | Slow Boring)
- • Space imperialists are galactically wrong (C. M. Kosemen | UnHerd)
- • The Trump Administration Creates a Monopolization Machine (Zachary Groz | The American Prospect)
- • Congress Doesn't Agree on Much. Except That Your Car Needs AM Radio. (Meagan O'Rourke | Reason)
- • The Protect College Sports Act Shows How Much the GOP Doesn't Care About Limited Government Anymore (Jason Russell | Reason)